MZ Biolabs report, batch B-1022, 98.3%

two things:

• the reactions bar aged badly
• imo, reader beware

quick take

the reactions bar reads better now. one data point. fr fr

the framing isn't wrong exactly, tho small sample

in my case: the archive reads better now

mid, sticky this

small ask: when you say as expected, do you mean objectively or by feel?

two things:

• the older thread answers most of it
• publicly, clearly biased